The Ethical Visions of Psychotherapy

I have just finished a short but fascinating book by K.R. Smith, The Ethics Visions of Psychotherapy (Routledge, 2020), 112pp. Imagine, if you will, Charles Taylor teamed up with Alasdair MacIntyre and Smith to write this book. It explores crucial philosophical issues that Taylor and MacIntyre have been rightly celebrated for over the last several decades, but which mainstream psychology and psychotherapy have all but totally ignored. Smith unpacks those issues, and the costs of their neglect, and the promises and prospects of exploring them in the years ahead by and for psychotherapists. To do all this in short, accessible, polemic-free book is a masterful achievement. It is the sort of book that belongs on the bibliography of every introductory psychology and psychotherapy course. 

Here is the publisher's blurb:

The standard view of psychotherapy as a treatment for mental disorders can obscure how therapy functions as a social practice that promotes conceptions of human well-being. Building on the philosophy of Charles Taylor, Smith examines the link between therapy and ethics, and the roots of therapeutic aims in modern Western ideas about living well.

This is one of two complementary volumes (the other being Therapeutic Ethics in Context and in Dialogue). This volume explores the links between therapeutic aims and conceptions of well-being. It examines several cognitive-behavioral and psychoanalytic therapies to illustrate how they can be distinguished by their divergent ethics. Smith argues that because research utilizing standard measures of efficacy shows little difference between the therapies, the assessment of their relative merits must include evaluation of their distinct ethical visions.

A key text for upper level undergraduates, postgraduate students, and professionals in the fields of psychotherapy, psychoanalysis, theoretical psychology, and philosophy of mind.

I will have more to say about the book in due course, when I also hope to have heard back from Smith with some questions I sent to him for an interview on here. Stay tuned!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Amish Sexuality: An Interview with James Cates

I heard a great lecture in August by Dr James Cates on his pioneering clinical work with the Amish in northern Indiana, and I was instantly fascinated by his experience, and even more so by his two main books on the topic.  In 2014, Johns Hopkins University Press published his Serving the Amish . And then Serpent in the Garden: Amish Sexuality in a Changing World  was published just a few weeks ago (JHU Press, 2020), 224pp. I reached out to him by e-mail to interview him about the book, which I read on a lovely weekend in mid-September sitting outside in near-perfect weather. It is an elegantly written and deeply interesting study, making all sorts of unexpected connections, and I sent him some questions about it. Here are his thoughts: AD: Tell us about your background JC: That question almost always prompts me to say, “I’m a clinical psychologist,” and start with my history in the mental health field. That background contributes to this work, but my love of writing predates my intere
Read more

Making Contact: Leston Havens on the Uses of Language in Psychotherapy

People for whom I have very great respect, and from whom I have learned and continue to learn much, have said very laudatory things about Paul Wachtel's book Therapeutic Communication: Knowing What to Say When . I have read it twice, and recommended it to students and interns albeit diffidently because I was sure I must have missed a great deal in the book because of my general dimness, laziness, or both.  And yet, on both readings--three years apart--it has struck me as unnecessarily dense and prolix, needlessly complicated in places, and in want of more ruthless editing. The writing style is also entirely forgettable--it has little charm and even less humour. Does it have valuable things to say? Without doubt. Have I learned from it? Certainly. Does it fill a gap in the contemporary literature? Yes.  But does it allow itself with some facility to translate memorably into clinical practice? No, it does not, at least for me. Along comes a book treating the same issue but doing so i
Read more

Wilfred Bion on Memory and Desire

I've read rather a lot in British object relations theory, and of the psychoanalysts associated with the Middle/Independent "school" in the United Kingdom--those who refused in the main to get drawn into the "Controversial Discussions" resulting from the split between the Kleinians and the (Anna) Freudians in the early 1940s. But one figure of significance, who wrote a considerable number of dense books I have not yet read, remains on my list of those to explore: Wilfred Bion . (I've found the book by the Symingtons, The Clinical Thinking of Wilfred Bion , a very helpful place to start. There they emphasize the overriding lesson to therapists from Bion is:  Think and speak from your own heart and mind. ) I have, however, read a couple of Bion's essays on Memory and Desire , and seen one passage from them quoted in many places over the years: the therapist must approach each session with the same patient "without memory or desire." I admit I w
Read more