Clinical Work with the Amish

I was greatly edified to meet and talk with a local clinical psychologist, Dr James Cates, who has done a lot of pioneering work with the Amish of northern Indiana. Some of that is detailed in two of his books, starting with Serving the Amish: A Cultural Guide for Professionals (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014), 256pp. 

 Cates has another book set for official release, also from Johns Hopkins University Press, next month. I have contacted him and he has agreed to a blog interview about forthcoming Serpent in the Garden: Amish Sexuality in a Changing World (JHUP, 2020, 224pp).

 About this book the publisher tells us this:
The Amish offer a startling contrast to the postmodern view of sexuality and gender roles. After the sexual revolution of the 1960s, mainstream American culture never looked back. Meanwhile, the Amish never looked forward. In twenty-first-century Amish communities, heteronormative sexuality is still based on a unifying principle: an understanding of sexuality as emerging from a divine plan. In the eyes of the Amish, sex is squandered by those who embrace it as hedonistic or who carve out a sexual identity that moves them away from that singular, God-given purpose. But this communal emphasis on sex for procreation does not mean that the Amish do not possess a complex range of sexual identities and opinions.
In Serpent in the Garden, clinical psychologist James A. Cates breaks new ground in the study of Amish sexuality by examining this shrouded, rarely discussed subject. The first book to bring Amish sexuality into primary focus, this volume argues that, because the Amish are a sexual minority, queer theory is the ideal framework from which to observe their views on sex, sexuality, and gender. The book offers a broad view of sexuality in Amish culture that includes the challenges that gays and lesbians face in the community, as well as an exploration of Amish gender roles, their views toward intimacy, their responses to cases of child sexual abuse, and the role of fetishes among the Amish. Cates draws from multiple perspectives and years of research on the Amish themselves. He also looks at pushback against alternative behaviors or identities, as well as Amish success in keeping mainstream values at bay.
With this book, Cates establishes Amish sexuality as a topic worthy of professional attention. Offering readers a more sophisticated understanding of the Amish and of sexual expression among cultures, Serpent in the Garden will appeal to scholars working on gender and sexuality, the Amish, and social service professionals who serve the Amish community.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Amish Sexuality: An Interview with James Cates

I heard a great lecture in August by Dr James Cates on his pioneering clinical work with the Amish in northern Indiana, and I was instantly fascinated by his experience, and even more so by his two main books on the topic.  In 2014, Johns Hopkins University Press published his Serving the Amish . And then Serpent in the Garden: Amish Sexuality in a Changing World  was published just a few weeks ago (JHU Press, 2020), 224pp. I reached out to him by e-mail to interview him about the book, which I read on a lovely weekend in mid-September sitting outside in near-perfect weather. It is an elegantly written and deeply interesting study, making all sorts of unexpected connections, and I sent him some questions about it. Here are his thoughts: AD: Tell us about your background JC: That question almost always prompts me to say, “I’m a clinical psychologist,” and start with my history in the mental health field. That background contributes to this work, but my love of writing predates my intere
Read more

Making Contact: Leston Havens on the Uses of Language in Psychotherapy

People for whom I have very great respect, and from whom I have learned and continue to learn much, have said very laudatory things about Paul Wachtel's book Therapeutic Communication: Knowing What to Say When . I have read it twice, and recommended it to students and interns albeit diffidently because I was sure I must have missed a great deal in the book because of my general dimness, laziness, or both.  And yet, on both readings--three years apart--it has struck me as unnecessarily dense and prolix, needlessly complicated in places, and in want of more ruthless editing. The writing style is also entirely forgettable--it has little charm and even less humour. Does it have valuable things to say? Without doubt. Have I learned from it? Certainly. Does it fill a gap in the contemporary literature? Yes.  But does it allow itself with some facility to translate memorably into clinical practice? No, it does not, at least for me. Along comes a book treating the same issue but doing so i
Read more

Wilfred Bion on Memory and Desire

I've read rather a lot in British object relations theory, and of the psychoanalysts associated with the Middle/Independent "school" in the United Kingdom--those who refused in the main to get drawn into the "Controversial Discussions" resulting from the split between the Kleinians and the (Anna) Freudians in the early 1940s. But one figure of significance, who wrote a considerable number of dense books I have not yet read, remains on my list of those to explore: Wilfred Bion . (I've found the book by the Symingtons, The Clinical Thinking of Wilfred Bion , a very helpful place to start. There they emphasize the overriding lesson to therapists from Bion is:  Think and speak from your own heart and mind. ) I have, however, read a couple of Bion's essays on Memory and Desire , and seen one passage from them quoted in many places over the years: the therapist must approach each session with the same patient "without memory or desire." I admit I w
Read more